PRINCE2 7 Foundation · Study lesson 18

Plans at the right level

Choose a useful horizon and distinguish the plans that support control.

9 minute study lesson · Practices · Original learning material

What you will understand

  • Distinguish project, stage, team and exception plans.
  • Explain why detailed planning has a limited horizon.
  • Recognise a work package as an agreement about delivery.

The idea

A detailed timetable for the distant future can look reassuring while resting on assumptions nobody can defend. A plan should provide enough information for a particular decision and management responsibility. Different levels of plan connect overall investment control to the practical products, resources and work that a team can commit to delivering.

The project plan provides the overall picture: major products, delivery timescales, costs, management stages and important control points. It supports the business case and helps the board assess project-level progress. It is not simply a collection of every task. Its estimates can be refined as the project learns more, with changes controlled against the authorised baseline.

A stage plan gives the project manager a sufficiently detailed basis for controlling one management stage. It identifies the products, resources, activities, costs and controls needed within that stage. At an approaching stage boundary, information from completed work supports a more credible plan for the next stage. Technical activities may overlap, but management stages provide successive decision periods rather than overlapping delegations of management authority.

A team plan, where useful, helps a team manager organise agreed delivery work. It may use a specialist scheduling format, a task board or another suitable arrangement. Its format matters less than whether it supports reliable delivery commitments and reporting. A work package description defines the agreed products and delivery arrangements between the project manager and the team manager; it is not simply another name for the team’s internal schedule.

An exception plan is prepared when requested by the appropriate directing authority after a forecast tolerance breach has been escalated. It offers a proposed replacement for the affected project or stage plan, covering the remaining work and consequences. Preparing a proposal does not authorise it. Once approved, the replacement becomes the basis for control. A team-level forecast breach is escalated to the project manager for action; it does not automatically require a board-approved exception plan.

The planning horizon is the distance into the future for which useful detail can be produced with reasonable confidence. Unfamiliar technology, volatile demand or uncertain approvals may shorten it. Keep a view of the whole project while detailing nearer work and refining later work when evidence improves. A plan includes assumptions, responsibilities, dependencies, risks, tolerances and controls as well as dates. Removing those explanations leaves a schedule that can conceal why its dates might fail.

Plans answer different levels of question

Plans answer different levels of question
PlanPurpose
Project planThe overall products, resources, timescales and investment picture.
Stage planDetailed control of one management stage.
Team planHow a team intends to deliver agreed products, where needed.
Exception planA proposed replacement for a plan forecast to exceed tolerance.

An original fictional example

Fictional example: a coastal archive move

An archive project includes surveying collections, preparing storage and moving records. The survey will reveal how much conservation work is necessary. The board needs an overall budget and key decision points, while the project manager needs a detailed plan for the survey stage. A specialist team also needs to schedule its inspection visits.

The decision

Keep project-level forecasts for the whole move, authorise a detailed survey stage plan and let the team organise its inspection work within the agreed work package.

Why it makes sense

The project retains direction without pretending that unknown conservation tasks can already be scheduled precisely. Each plan supports a different management responsibility.

A common confusion

The mistaken idea: A project plan is only valid if every future task is already planned in detail.

The distinction: Whole-project visibility and detailed near-term control are compatible. Later stages can be refined as information becomes available, within agreed governance.

Whole-project direction; nearer-stage detail.

Points to remember

  • An exception plan requires authorisation before replacing a baseline.
  • A work package agreement and an internal team plan have different purposes.
  • A planning horizon reflects uncertainty, not merely the project end date.

Your takeaway

Use project, stage and optional team plans at suitable levels of detail. An authorised exception plan replaces an affected baseline; a planning horizon helps decide where detailed forecasts are credible.

This independently written explanation is supplementary study material. It is not official examination content. Read about our content and its limitations.